Primordia Co.Grounded World Models

Appendix I Notation and Parameter Provenance

This appendix lists every quantity the paper relies on—its symbol, value, and how we obtained it. Each is measured from the deployed system, derived in closed form from other quantities, fixed by construction, or assumed (with the basis stated). The measured quantities feed the prose and the figures from one shared source, so the two cannot disagree.

Measurement methods.

Seven measurement procedures produce the data. The build-cost measurement aggregates per-case input/output tokens, USD, and wall-clock from MODEL-stage production logs across 1,184 deployed case versions. The parameter-count audit counts numeric literals in the GWM configuration, counting shared global/sector parameters once and per-case parameters times the universe size. The narrative-arm ablation re-runs the production case drafter as a one-shot NWM over 20 cases under prompt caching, recording cache-adjusted cost, tokens, API calls, and latency. The explanation-quality evaluation scores each NWM memo with a tool-backed judge that recomputes every internal-consistency invariant with a deterministic calculator (yielding S and CC) and judges hardness-to-vary against Definition 10. The inference-cost benchmark times one belief-propagation pass at 10,000 samples over recent deployed cases and prices the median warm wall-clock at a standardized on-demand vCPU-hour rate. The predictive-distribution token count measures, over the same scored memos, the tokens of the predictive distribution’s numeric figures (the scenario and direction tables), giving the LLM’s best-case per-PD output. The incremental-PD (re-query) measurement reissues the counterfactual do(a) queries of Definition 9 as warm, cache-hit-only calls (cache re-read, no cache write) against the deployed NWM arm over 18 such calls, recording the median cache-read tokens (Tcache), median latency, and a median cost ($0.1625); the pre-blow-up output-token term Tout is then calibrated so that Eq. (8), evaluated at the deployed attainment ANWM=0.36, reproduces this measured median cost exactly.

Measured.

Symbol Quantity Value Source / method
cbuild GWM build cost per case $2.35 Build-cost measurement over 1,184 deployed case versions; same source fixes build tokens (2,090,000 in / 18,100 out) and wall-clock (6.8 min).
cNWM NWM cost per case (sourced memo) $1.63 Narrative-arm ablation over 20 cases (range $1.21$1.82); same source fixes memo latency (230 s).
cPD GWM cost & latency per predictive distribution $1.0×106, 0.086 s Inference benchmark: median warm belief-propagation wall-clock (10,000 samples) directly gives the latency; × a standardized vCPU-hour rate gives the cost.
Tcache,Tout NWM incremental-PD cached-context and pre-blow-up output tokens 69,069, 1,355 Incremental-PD (re-query) measurement over 18 warm do(a) re-queries: Tcache is the median cache-read token count; Tout is calibrated so Eq. (8) reproduces the measured median warm cost ($0.1625) at ANWM=0.36. Same calls fix the incremental-PD latency (30.9 s).
S,CC,HtV NWM explanation-quality components Table 4 Explanation-quality evaluation over 20 cases (S/CC tool-checked, HtV judged); best-case PD output tokens via the predictive-distribution token count.
AGWM,ANWM XQ attainment ceilings Table 4 bounded joint-correctness probability A=ici=exp(XQ) (Eq. (7)).
1β subdomain-novelty decay 0.6 Heaps’ law (App. C).
cNWM NWM upfront (first memo + cached context) $2.07 cNWM (first memo) +Tcache× cache-write price.
best-case per-PD cost ratio 35,606× NWM cached re-read + figures-only output (no blow-up) ÷cPD.
incremental-PD latency ratio 357× measured warm NWM re-query latency ÷ measured GWM per-PD latency (no best-case extrapolation: latency has a fixed network/decode floor that cost does not, so it is anchored at the directly measured point rather than the cost model’s best-case token count).
build break-even 4 PDs at XQ target A=0.1.
3cNWM NWM cost per case (full evidence chain) $4.9 full evidence chain.

Structural (fixed by construction).

Symbol Quantity Value Basis
S,CC,HtV,R GWM components Table 4 Exact given evidence: stiffness and counterfactual consistency =1 by construction; HtV=0.92 is itself the product of rigorous iterative construction (adversarial validation + belief propagation + empirical calibration), so <1 (bounded misspecification) yet conservatively well above the NWM’s one-shot median (0.67); R from exact/large-sample belief propagation.
R NWM residual control Table 4 Measured per memo: R=1f1/(K1) from the simplex volume compatible with the narrative’s probability bands (Appendix C); the GWM’s large-sample R is the generous ceiling.

Assumed (with basis).

Symbol Quantity Value Basis
pin,pout,pcache token prices ($/Mtok) 5,25,0.5 Published Opus 4.8 list prices.
PLLM SOTA-LLM parameters 1.0×1012 Order of magnitude.
Tctx,n NWM cold-context tokens; MC-averaged emissions/PD 1,000,000, 1,000 Amortization-model assumptions (Tcache and Tout, the tokens entering Eq. (8) directly, are measured; see the Measured table above).
η NWM cost–quality blow-up exponent 2.5 Identified, not free: η=ln(1/q¯)/λ (Eq. (11), Proposition 4); numerical value calibrated (Appendix F).
Tsub,β subdomain-synthesis tokens; Heaps exponent 10,000,0.4 Engineering / structural.